No doubt they have changed drastically. There was a time when it was impossible to unite two parties, any two parties, for whatever reason. Even inside the Communist party, there were several sub-parties. The Communist party, the Communist (Marxist) party, the Revolutionary Socialist party, the Revolutionary Communist party, the Naxalites, the Forward Bloc party, and so on. Then there were the Janata party, the Bahujan Samaj party, the AIDMK party, the main Congress party, the Maanila Congress party and so on.
But look at them now. They are all united. The Congress and all the rest have joined together. What was the magical reason? To join their strength against the ‘Hindu’ BJP of course. Since when all the myriad parties developed this indomitable will to fight the BJP? Even during the Quit India Movement, Gujral’s Communist party didn’t join hands with the freedom fighters; they had joined hands with India’s enemies: the British, because they happened to be on the same side as Communist Russia’s and the Mohammedans, for they were claiming Pakistan which implied dismembering of the existing India. But this time, even the Communists have joined hands with the rest apparently because they perceive the BJP as a truer representative of Hindu interest. The real enemy to these multifarious parties is India as we understand it and any party that is perceived as pro-India.
They are even against those Mohammedans who are really patriotic. They support the communalist Mohammedans, those that openly run down the Hindu heritage of India. They are the ones who talk against ‘lighting of lamps’ before a solemn function, talk about a Mohammedan’s loyalty to Khuda and not to the country of birth. They openly speak of ‘khuda-parasti’ as against ‘watan-parasti’. They have different words for ‘diya jalana’; they call it ‘shamaa ko raushan karna’. And India’s secular parties go for them.
There are/were very very few nationalist Mohammedans in India. M.C. Chagla was one of them. And he had said while he was still alive (in Roses in December): “But one grievance, about which I feel deeply, arose from the indifference shown by the Congress, and even Mahatma Gandhi to the Muslim nationalists. Jinnah and his communal followings seemed all important – we counted for nothing…
“I have, therefore, often strongly disagreed with the Goverment of India’s policy of constantly harping upon minorities and minority rights. It comes in the way of national unity and emphasizes the differences between the majority community and the minority. Of course, it may serve well as a vote catching device to win Muslim votes, but I do not believe in sacrificing national interests in order to get temporary party benefits such as getting a few more seats in certain constituencies…
“I am horrified to find that in my country, while monogamy has been made the law for the Hindus, Muslims can still indulge in the luxury of polygamy. It is an insult to womanhood, and the Muslim women, I know, resent this discrimination between Muslim women and Hindu women…”
And the Indian Constitution was changed to incorporate Muslim Personal Law within 36 hours of Haji Mastaan’s threat to Rajiv Gandhi, the then prime minister. (No doubt Rajiv’s Islamic roots prompted the speedy change in the law, for Rajiv, unbeknown to the people of India, was the direct grandson of Nawab Khan, the Sunni liquor supplier to Moti Lal Nehru’s family in Allahabad. People know only that Rajiv was the grandson of Jawahar Lal but then, everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal grandfather. All these years we have been told that Rajiv had only one grandfather, an impossibility. Indira had become a Mussalmanani when she nikah-ed Nawab Khan’s son Firoz. The Gandhi name came later by an affidavit in England at the suggestion of the old Gandhi, the apostle of truth.)
But does the real motivation of the unity of these diverse parties in India today stem from the unexplained hatred of the BJP? Certainly that cannot be true? It stems from corruption and greed for money. For money these leaders (don’t get me wrong, even the BJP leaders are equally corrupt!) can do anything.
How do we know? A good question! Let us listen to Dr. Ahmed Totenji of Riyadh University of Saudi Arabia. He came all the way from al Arabiyya al Saudiyya to speak at a meeting organized by India’s Jamait-i-Islami of all places, at Gorakhpur. There Dr. Totenji said on September 17, 1982, fifteen years ago: “India’s leaders are overtly so corrupt and vulnerable that India’s Muslims need to create pressure on the Hindu leaders to work for Islamization of India…” Dr. Totenji was blatant and continued: “The so called secular parties of India have no principles and there is nothing on earth they are not prepared to do in order to achieve some personal gains. The Indian leaders, newspapers and the pseudo-secular parties were paid 250 crores of rupees for the purpose. This had already yielded encouraging results. They will, from now on, always fight against Hindu organizations. As soon as the Muslim population will reach about 20 or 25 crores, we will easily wipe out these Hindu organizations…
“Remember, the way we had taken help and assistance from the Communists in Iran and even from Russia to drive away the Shah and then wiped out the Communists. We did the same in Indonesia. There is no reason that India will be an exception. Mind you, only 15% of Muslims had fought against 85% of Hindus to found Pakistan. So I see no problem whatsoever for 30% Muslims to wipe out these socalled nationalists and pseudo-secular parties to establish an Islamic state in India.”
We do not need any pundit to interpret the substance of his speech. A quiet understanding of Dr. Totenji’s speech will throw light on the current body-language of India’s leaders, the media and the keepers of law and order.
The amount of money that is being channeled to India’s media, is enormous. The entire media is living on Arab and ISI money. However, there is a condition. By the year 2000 AD, there has to be 50% Mohammedan employees in those newspapers drawing money from the Arabs. Some newspapers, had accepted the money but didn’t want to hire 50% of the news editors, journalists and other technical members of the staff; they had hoodwinked Muslim interests by engaging only the sweepers, the watchmen etc. In short, they had hired 50% of the employees but kept the control of the newspaper’s policy and ideology in the hands of the directors of the paper.
But such tricks did not hold good for long. The next year, the conditions were spelled out more clearly. The money will be offered to those segments only of the media that hired equal number of Muslims and non-Muslims for the editorial posts. Thus eminent Indian newspapers now have joint editors, joint sub-editors, joint reporters and so on, right down the line, one a Mohammedan and the other a non-Mohammedan. That way nothing would be written against the Mohammedans. Even when a communal riot is started by the Mohammedans, the newspaper will have to announce that there was a riot between two communities without naming the offending side. The people will thus be permanently kept in darkness.
A leading journalist recently said openly that his chief editor had told him: ‘You may praise the Hindus as much as you like; but not a word against the Muslims must be printed!’ Thus when the Muslim militants kill a dozen Kashmiri Pandits in Jammu, it is reported as an ordinary story of mayhem in which the identity of the killer and the killed remains unspecified. The news service in India has been quietly reduced to NO news service!
The same is the case with the Indian movies. Any movie extolling Hindu heroism is denounced by the Mohammedans. The movie Border is a glaring example. Hindu actors and actresses are made to play not so edifying parts. Even Amitabh Bachchan gloats in his role in Khuda Gawah. How low can one fall? Only the good side of the Muslims need be shown on the silver screen!
False glorification of Indian Mohammedans is the order of the day. Only the other day, Bihar’s Mohammedan governor Kidwai observed the birth centenary of Zakir Husain and India’s president Sharma and vice president Narayanan attended the ceremony. But Zakir was a traitor. In June, 1947 he had offered his services to Jinnah; but Jinnah had no need for a traitor and so Zakir was not hired by him. While in the Rashtrapati Bhavan, Zakir even quietly got a mosque built, and the people of India were not any the wiser! Remember Asaf Ali? He was a spy working for the British during the time he was a member of the Congress Working Committee. Later, as soon as he was hired by Nehru as India’s ambassador in Washington, his office was instrumental in transfer-ing a ship-load of weapons purchased by the GoI, to Karachi, where it was summarily impounded. The man was recalled but NOT punished. Gandhi and Nehru hired him as the governor of Orissa. Why do you think people whisper that both Nehru and Gandhi were bastard sons of Mohammedan fathers? It is the same Asaf who had tried to get
Abdur Rashid,the killer of Swami Shraddhanand released but failed. That murderer was hanged by the British in spite of Asaf Ali!
Unless the immediate cleaning of the Augean stables is undertaken, things are sure to go much worse. The Mohammedan population in India in the year 1947 was 45 million; within less than 50 years, it has gone up to 160 million, thanks to polygamy and no one even whimpers; not even the BJP!
Before the century is out, Hindus should expect a long drawn out and merciless slaughter throughout India. No doubt the unprepared Hindus will get the bloody nose first; they will survive only if enough life and courage are still left in the body to fight back. Now that there is no Gandhi and Nehru, one cannot foresee any unexpected Nehruvian ‘cease fire’ nor another ‘fast unto death’. That might help bring the true independence of India, in the year 2000 AD. The one in 1947, which brought about Nehru’s tryst with destiny was only a sham independence. We all know that but are ashamed to be truthful about it. That is because truth is dead in India since Gandhi and Nehru took over. All that has been passed off as truth during the last fifty years or so, was only ‘make believe’ pantomime!
Once again, our gods have saved us. In a country where people would not even hurt a chicken, there were not one, not two but three assassinations in quick succession. And surprise of surprises, all three were Gandhis. One was killed by a Hindu, the second by two Sikhs and the third by a Catholic Tamil lady. If it is not divine dispensation, then what would we call it? In the mean time, Nehru and Sanjay acted as if they had committed suicide; unbeknown to the people, the chacha died of syphilis and Sanjay (aka Sanjiv) killed himself in that stunt airplane!
